Tuesday, November 1, 2011

Blog Post 10: Specific Ethical Question

The Morning After Pill:
Pharmacists are asked
Is it ethical to allow females to buy the morning after pill?
Argument for Yes- It is argued that yes it is ethical because it is giving the female the choice to control her life. Many say that it is not the sale of the pill that is the problem; it’s the education that people are receiving.
Argument for No- It is argued that no it is not ethical because every person is put on this earth for a reason. Who knows maybe you just killed the human being that would have discovered the cure for a certain disease(s). They also say that even if you didn’t intend on that happening you could also do embryonic stem cell research instead. Some argue that with the sale of this pill, it is giving younger people the idea that having sex before they are ready is ok because they will have the pill.


As a pharmacist I would sell the morning after pill.

I however personally side with the argument for against it. I understand that everyone is entitled to make decisions for themselves about what direction they want to take their life.  I would say the sale of the pill would be ok for reasons such as cases of rape. I otherwise believe that everyone is put on this earth for a reason and so you should allow that life to live. Your parents kept you, they decided that you were important to them. If you personally don’t want to keep the life your responsible for creating then there are adoption agencies and programs where you can hand your child over to authorities after the first 72 hours of life to give them a better life then what you can provide for them at this point in time.

http://www.prolifephysicians.org/map_esc.htm
http://www.thefword.org.uk/features/2001/03/the_morning_after

Blog Post 9: Project Title, Issue, and Action Plan

Post your team's project Title, Issue, and Action Plan.

Click on the Link below to find our Project:
https://docs.google.com/present/edit?id=0AfQ1sF3FAtuyZGRwNjlmOGpfNGhzM3M0M2Y4

Blog Post 8: Ethical Question

Is it ethical for a physician to accept Wild tickets from a pharmaceutical rep to take her family to the game?

I think that if you are accepting the tickets under circumstances that do not pertain to work then it is alright. Otherwise I think that it is a conflict of interest and that they should not be accepted. Many may not agree with this stance, but it is my personal morals and beliefs. You do not mix business with pleasure. Many things can go wrong when this happens.

Blog Post 7: General Ethics

Post an ethical code/statement for your career field of interest that has been developed by a professional organization in your field.

Post this code/statement for the following countries: USA, India, China, Thailand, Saudi Arabia, and Isreal

Blog Post 6: Diversity

Talk about what diversity means to you. And explain how valuing and championing diversity will help you in your career.

Post the diversity statements from 5 companies or organizations in your field of interest, comment how they are similar and/or different. How do each of these fit with your own diversity values?
--Diversity, to me, means differences. These differences can vary from race to views on different issues. No two individuals are completely identical down to the core. Diversity will help in my career because not everyone will have the same viewpoints within the medical community. My hopes are to work as a pharmacist or work in pharmaceutical and medical sales. These fields can be controversial for many reasons. One major issue within the medical field is on stem cell research and if we should be tampering with the natural order of things.

1. http://www.medtronic.com/about-medtronic/diversity/   
2. http://www.mayo.edu/diversity/meet-us/diversity-policy-statement
3. http://www.healtheast.org/about-healtheast/healtheast-care-system/care-for-all-cultures.html?q=diversity+statement
4. http://marshfieldclinic.kramesonline.com/healthsheets/3,s,84997
5. http://www.pfizer.com/about/diversity/diversity.jsp

They are all saying about how they are an equal opportunity employer/equal treatment facility. They all fit my idea of diversity values.

Post 5: PDP

Goals:
To graduate from Stout in May 2012
To graduate from CVTC in May 2013 with a Pharmacy Tech. degree
To be accepted to pharmacy school in Duluth, MN @ U of M-Duluth

Values:
The things that I value in my life:
Family and Friends
Health
Happiness
Ability to work at a place that makes work not seem like work


Why are the goals listed above are important to me?

The goals listed above are important because I want to work as a pharmacist. When I graduate from stout I will have a Bachelors of Science degree in Applied Science with a minor in Business Administration. I have already been accepted to CVTC for the Fall 2012 for the Pharmacy Technician program. I will start to apply to pharmacy school with the ultimate goal being accepted into the pharmacy program at the University of Minnesota-Duluth.

Post 4: Carbon Dioxide Paper Evaluation

1. Post your group's presentation.



2. Reflect on the strengths and weaknesses of the criteria established. Where these good criteria, or should there have been different criteria established?

The criteria that had been established was very broad. As a result of this it made evaluating from the standpoint that the paper was valid in my opinion to be difficult.



3. Reflect on the strengths and weaknesses of the presentations as a whole. Consider the "yes" and "no" groups as a whole.

The presentations were very well done. They all followed the class set-up criteria for evaluating the paper. They all made very solid arguments as to why the paper was valid or invalid.



4. Reflect on the group management of your group. What went well, what did not?

We were well organized. Our group met outside of class to work on this presentation. However it didn’t work that we all were thinking that this paper was invalid and we had to argue that that this paper was valid.



5. Reflect on the personal "ethic" you felt in your group. Did you believe in your position? Where you arguing against your beliefs?

I did not believe in the position that I was defending. I was arguing against what I thought was correct. Like many stated a lot of things with this paper didn’t add up, ranging from the lack of creditability of the sources to the lack of research actually done by the authors themselves.


6. Did the class make the correct decision when considering the broader impacts of the global warming/climate change debate? Why?

Yes, the class in general did make the correct decision.  I believe this because there was more evidence to support that side of the argument.

7. Explain the statement, "What we do in the US, soon will not matter." Provide evidence to justify this statement.

Other countries are slowly surpassing the US. Most of the things that we do here in the US are results of outsourced jobs. An example of this would be the building of car parts.



8. Explain this statement, "What we do as individuals matters." Provide evidence to justify this statement.

What one person does can change a series of events. It is like the butterfly effect. The butterfly effect is saying that if one thing is different it changes the outcome of the future.